Utilization of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K)

SLEDAI-2K is a Global Disease Index used to assess disease activity in patients with SLE.¹

There is an extensive range of disease activity indices of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on clinical studies and trials. However, many are complex given the intent for which they were created. The SLEDAI-2K tool is often used in clinical trials to measure SLE disease activity. Other indices used in SLE clinical trials include British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-2004 (BILAG-2004) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). These indices are components of composite endpoints, such as SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group–based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA).²

For a complete assessment using SLEDAI-2K, the following are required³:

  • Urine specimens to include proteinuria, hematuria, pyuria, and urinary casts
  • Blood specimens for anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), complement, white blood cells, and platelets
  • Physical examination, including assessment for visual disturbances

Implementation of SLEDAI-2K

SLEDAI-2K is an index that¹ ⁴ ⁵:

  • Tracks 24 manifestations across 9 organ systems
  • Captures only complete improvement of an item in a one-month span
  • Weighs certain manifestations more heavily than others on a spectrum from 1 to 8 points

The overall SLEDAI-2K score ranges from 0 to 105, with a score of 6 being deemed clinically important. A decrease of 4 in SLEDAI-2K is regarded as a meaningful improvement.¹

To download the SLEDAI-2K data collection sheet, please click here.

Data collection sheet provided with permission from The Journal of Rheumatology, Gladman DD, et al. SLEDAI 2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(2):288-291. All rights reserved.

References: 1. Mikdashi J, Nived O. Measuring disease activity in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: the challenges of administrative burden and responsiveness to patient concerns in clinical research. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):183. doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0702-6 2. Ohmura K. Which is the best SLE activity index for clinical trials? Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31(1):20-28. 3. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. SLEDAI 2K Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(2):288-291. 4. Arora S, Isenberg DA, Castrejon I. Measures of adult systemic lupus erythematosus: disease activity and damage. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72 Suppl 10:27-46. doi:10.1002/acr.24221 5. Ramsey-Goldman R, Isenberg DA. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Measures: British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM), Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Measure (SLEDAI), and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology-Damage Index (SLICC/ACR-DI; SDI). Arthritis Care Res. 2003;49(S5):S225-S233.

©2025 AstraZeneca. All rights reserved. US-106676 Last Updated 11/25

Posted by
  • As a speaker at the first ad hoc meeting of rheumatology practice managers gathered in a single small room at its infancy a decade ago, I’m amazed to see how NORM has blossomed into a high energy organization of depth and professional meetings with parallel break-out symposia between plenary sessions. NORM has truly come of age. This is where the “business” of rheumatology gets learned. The ”guildmanship” for rheumatology practice management is now strong.- Paul H. Caldron, DO, FACP, FACR, MBA, Arizona Arthritis and Rheumatology Associates
  • In a time of demanding changes in the management of medical practices in the US, NORM has been a lifesaver to the community of Rheumatology practices.  NORM has allowed our practice to stay ahead of the many demands of CMS and others payors and has ensured that our practice remains cognizant of new issues that arise in HIPPA compliance, human resources and medical billing to name a few. Sending our Practice Manager to NORM's conferences has been cost-effective and beneficial to our practice because she returns to our office with an abundance of information that otherwise would have taken months to compile. Every Rheumatology practice that wishes to stay on top of emerging issues in practice management should consider sending a member of their staff to NORM's conference.- Michael S. Rosen M.D., Chester County Rheumatology PC
  • Thanks to all those wonderful people in the NORM Network who respond to emails, offering their advice, experience, time, and support ... I haven't even been a member a full year yet and I am amazed at the dedication of everyone who responds to helping via emails and the NORM Organization itself! I have barely had a chance to explore the resources and I have yet to really dive into requests for help still I am silently learning so much and do occasionally offer what I can! Thank you all!- Cheryl Piambino, Kenneth E. Bresky, DO

What We Offer

We’re adding value to practices across the nation by creating a thriving community of rheumatology managers and physicians.

Membership Benefits

Become a Member

Annual Conference

Conference Registration